Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778547›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2025

Efficacy evaluation of the hard-channel technique and transsylvian microsurgical operation in the treatment of basal ganglia haemorrhage.

Ning Li, Qiang Yang, Wang Miao, Bin Ji

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ning LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Changzhi People's Hospital, Changzhi, China.
Qiang YangDepartment of Emergency, Changzhi People's Hospital, Changzhi, China.
Wang MiaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Bin JiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Changzhi People's Hospital, Changzhi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of the hard-channel technique and the transsylvian microsurgical operation in treating basal ganglia cerebral haemorrhage (BGCH).

methodsClinical data from 100 patients with BGCH treated at our hospital between February 2019 and May 2022 were analysed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: the hard-channel group (

resultsThe hard-channel group had a shorter surgery duration (32.37 ± 8.32 vs 197.14 ± 39.77 min,

conclusionThe hard-channel technique was found to offer a shorter surgery duration and reduced intraoperative bleeding. The transsylvian microsurgical approach was associated with higher GOS and ADL scores at earlier time points (1 and 3 months), suggesting a potentially faster recovery. However, these differences were not sustained at 5 months. These findings highlight the need for individualised treatment decisions based on patient-specific factors and further studies to validate these observations.

Indexed as

Basal Ganglia HemorrhageMicrosurgeryNeurosurgical ProceduresAdultAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeactivities of daily livingBasal Ganglia cerebral haemorrhageGlasgow Outcome Scalehard channelNational Institutes of Health Stroke Scaletranssylvian

Identifiers

PMID40778547
PMCPMC12337719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.