ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
A Machine Learning-Based Modeling Approach for Dye Removal Using Modified Natural Adsorbents.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study used machine learning models to investigate the potential of biosorbents derived from natural fruit seed waste (apricot, almond, and walnut) for removing a cationic dye. Levulinic acid (LA)-modified powders of almond shell (ASh), apricot kernel shell (APKSh), and walnut shell (WSh) were used to remove methylene blue (MB) from an aqueous solution, producing 105 experimental data points under various circumstances. Attributes included pH (3-5), adsorbent dose (0.4-6.0 g/L), concentration (10-500 mg/L), time (30-600 min), and temperature (25-55 °C). Species information was incorporated into the data set using the One-Hot Encoding method. The data were normalized using the min-max method, and due to the non-normal distribution of the data, Spearman correlation analysis was employed to rank the importance of the attributes. Gradient Boosting (GB), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), XGBoost (XGB), and Random Forest (RF) algorithms were applied for regression estimation. Based on 5-fold cross-validation results, the GB model achieved the highest performance, with R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.