Trial reportHead & neck2026
Thyroid Volume Measurement With AI-Assisted Freehand 3D Ultrasound Compared to 2D Ultrasound-A Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Head & neck, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05510609 (Three-dimensional Ultrasonography), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Three-dimensional Ultrasonography: Accuracy in Thyroid Volume Measurement.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAccurate thyroid volume assessment is critical in thyroid disease diagnostics, yet conventional high-resolution 2D ultrasound has limitations. Freehand 3D ultrasound with AI-assisted segmentation presents a potential advancement, but its clinical accuracy requires validation.
methodThis prospective clinical trial included 14 patients scheduled for total thyroidectomy. Preoperative thyroid volume was measured using both 2D ultrasound (ellipsoid method) and freehand 3D ultrasound with AI segmentation. Postoperative thyroid volume, determined via the water displacement method, served as the reference standard.
resultsThe median postoperative thyroid volume was 14.8 mL (IQR 8.8-20.2). The median volume difference was 1.7 mL (IQR 1.2-3.3) for 3D ultrasound and 3.6 mL (IQR 2.3-6.6) for 2D ultrasound (p = 0.02). The inter-operator reliability coefficient for 3D ultrasound was 0.986 (p < 0.001).
conclusionThese findings suggest that freehand 3D ultrasound with AI-assisted segmentation provides superior accuracy and reproducibility compared to 2D ultrasound and may enhance clinical thyroid volume assessment.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05510609.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.