ReviewEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025
Management of device embolisation during left atrial appendage closure.
Review in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Percutaneous Retrieval Strategies Following Left Atrial Appendage Occluder and Peri-Device Leak Closure Embolization.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Percutaneous Retrieval of Embolized Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device From Mitral Valve Apparatus.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Late Hybrid Retrieval of an Embolized Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device: A Case and Literature Review.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Late migration of a left atrial appendage closure device to the bifurcation of common iliac arteries: a case report and novel percutaneous retrieval technique.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is increasingly used as a valuable intervention to prevent cardioembolic stroke among patients with atrial fibrillation who are poor candidates for long-term anticoagulation. The safety of the procedure has significantly improved over time; nevertheless, device embolisation remains a severe complication that still occurs in around 0.1% of cases. Its management must be rapid and effective in order to reduce mortality. The anatomical location of the embolised device dictates the technical approach for retrieval and has a major impact on the clinical outcome of patients. Percutaneous recapture is the main approach in case of an aortic or left atrial embolisation, while emergent surgery should be performed if the device becomes entangled in the mitral apparatus with poor haemodynamics unsolved by transcatheter device mobilisation into the left ventricular (LV) cavity. In cases of LV embolisation and stable haemodynamics, a transfemoral or transseptal retrieval may be attempted. The equipment for retrieval is key to success: all cath labs performing LAAC procedures should be equipped with minimum 16 Fr sheaths, steerable sheaths, single-loop snares and grasping tool devices. This paper includes a summary of the European Left Atrial Appendage Closure Club consensus recommendations for LAAC device embolisation management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.