ArticleFuture oncology (London, England)2025
Access to treatment-guiding biomarkers in the UK: surveys of cancer patients and healthcare professionals.
Article in Future oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive Biomarkers for Asymptomatic Adults: Opportunities, Risks, and Guidance for General Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo understand current barriers to treatment-guiding biomarker testing in cancer patients in the UK.
methodsA literature search, interviews with healthcare professionals, and a focus group of cancer patients were used to identify current challenges and barriers to treatment guiding biomarker testing. These were followed by online surveys of healthcare professionals and patients designed to further explore and quantify challenges to biomarker testing within the UK.
resultsChallenges were identified across the entire biomarker testing pathway, the most common being insufficient workforce, long turnaround times, and lack of specific training. These challenges had a negative impact on patient access to targeted cancer therapies.
conclusionsChallenges to accessing treatment-guiding biomarker testing of cancer patients within the UK are impacting clinical decision-making. There is a requirement to improve awareness and training of healthcare professionals, particularly nurses and advanced clinical practitioners, with opportunities to improve outdated and fragmented ordering and reporting processes. Steps should also be taken to improve the availability of plain-language information materials for patients, to promote understanding and self-advocacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.