ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Secure latent Dirichlet allocation.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A visual analysis of the research dynamics of biomarkers for lung cancer screening.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Article
- Topic Modeling of Nursing Documentation in Hemodialysis Units: A Mixed-Methods Study of Nursing Surveillance Activities.Journal of nursing management · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Topic modelling refers to a popular set of techniques used to discover hidden topics that occur in a collection of documents. These topics can, for example, be used to categorize documents or label text for further processing. One popular topic modelling technique is Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA). In topic modelling scenarios, the documents are often assumed to be in one, centralized dataset. However, sometimes documents are held by different parties, and contain privacy- or commercially-sensitive information that cannot be shared. We present a novel, decentralized approach to train an LDA model securely without having to share any information about the content of the documents. We preserve the privacy of the individual parties using a combination of privacy enhancing technologies. Next to the secure LDA protocol, we introduce two new cryptographic building blocks that are of independent interest; a way to efficiently convert between secret-shared- and homomorphic-encrypted data as well as a method to efficiently draw a random number from a finite set with secret weights. We show that our decentralized, privacy preserving LDA solution has a similar accuracy compared to an (insecure) centralised approach. With 1024-bit Paillier keys, a topic model with 5 topics and 3000 words can be trained in around 16 h. Furthermore, we show that the solution scales linearly in the total number of words and the number of topics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.