Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778364›Full record

ReviewOphthalmology science

Applications of Computer Vision for Infectious Keratitis: A Systematic Review.

Jad F Assaf, Abhimanyu S Ahuja, Vishnu Kannan, Hady Yazbeck, Jenna Krivit, Travis K Redd

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Artificial intelligence in microbial keratitis.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jad F AssafCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Abhimanyu S AhujaCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Vishnu KannanKeraLink International, Baltimore, Maryland.
Hady YazbeckCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Jenna KrivitFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Travis K ReddCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Funding

Applications of artificial intelligence to the diagnostic evaluation of infectious keratitisK23EY032639 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Travis Kenneth Redd · 2022 to 2026
$1.3M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY032639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical Relevance: Corneal ulcers cause preventable blindness in >2 million individuals annually, primarily affecting low- and middle-income countries. Prompt and accurate pathogen identification is essential for targeted antimicrobial treatment, yet current diagnostic methods are costly and slow and require specialized expertise, limiting accessibility. Methods: We systematically reviewed literature published from 2017 to 2024, identifying 37 studies that developed or validated artificial intelligence (AI) models for pathogen detection and related classification tasks in infectious keratitis. The studies were analyzed for model types, input modalities, datasets, ground truth determination methods, and validation practices. Results: Artificial intelligence models demonstrated promising accuracy in pathogen detection using image interpretation techniques. Common limitations included limited generalizability, lack of diverse datasets, absence of multilabeled classification methods, and variability in ground truth standards. Most studies relied on single-center retrospective datasets, limiting applicability in routine clinical practice. Conclusions: Artificial intelligence shows significant potential to improve pathogen detection in infectious keratitis, enhancing both diagnostic accuracy and accessibility globally. Future research should address identified limitations by increasing dataset diversity, adopting multilabel classification, implementing prospective and multicenter validations, and standardizing ground truth definitions. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningInfectious keratitisMachine learningTranslational science review

Identifiers

PMID40778364
PMCPMC12329105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.