ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025
Safety and tolerability of onasemnogene abeparvovec for patients with spinal muscular atrophy weighing ≤17 kg and ≤24 months old from OFELIA, a phase 4, open-label, multicenter, non-randomised, interventional study.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05073133 (A Phase IV Open-label, Single-arm, Single-dose, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the saFEty, toLerability and effIcacy of Gene Replacement Therapy With intravenousOAV101), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase IV Open-label, Single-arm, Single-dose, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the saFEty, toLerability and effIcacy of Gene Replacement Therapy With intravenousOAV101(AVXS101) in Pediatric Patients From Latin America With Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) - OFELIA
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and efficacy of intravenous onasemnogene abeparvovec gene therapy in patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1: interim analysis from LT-001, a long-term follow-up study of patients from the START study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Deaths in gene therapy of Duchenne muscular dystrophy and other diseases: Underlying mechanisms and mitigating strategies.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: OFELIA aimed to evaluate outcomes related to safety and motor milestones following administration of onasemnogene abeparvovec, a one-time gene replacement therapy, for patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) from Latin America. Methods: OFELIA (NCT05073133) is a phase 4, 18-month, open-label, multicenter, non-randomised study (Brazil, Argentina) of onasemnogene abeparvovec treatment (1·1 × 10 Findings: Sixteen patients were enrolled (n = 11/16 female; n = 10/16 SMA type 1) (n = 17 screened). All reported adverse events (AEs). Eleven reported serious AEs; 12 reported an AE of special interest, most commonly hepatotoxicity (asymptomatic) (n = 11/12), thrombocytopenia (n = 5/12), and thrombotic microangiopathy (n = 2/12). Two deaths occurred: one possibly related to treatment (AST >20 × upper limit of normal, sepsis, infection, multiorgan failure, thrombotic microangiopathy) and one due to respiratory infection. Most patients maintained/improved motor milestones up to 18 months post-onasemnogene abeparvovec (e.g., sitting, crawling, standing, walking), including those in the >12-24-month age group. Interpretation: Most common AEs of special interest were hepatotoxicity, thrombocytopenia, and thrombotic microangiopathy; incidence rates (hepatotoxicity, thrombocytopenia) were similar compared with studies in patients >6 months of age and >8·5 kg. Efficacy data on demonstration of motor milestones suggest that Latin American patients with SMA may benefit from onasemnogene abeparvovec treatment. Funding: The study was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.