Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778326›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

A feasibility study of a physical activity intervention for people with severe mental illness in medium secure psychiatric services in the United Kingdom.

Gloria Roden-Lui, Guy Faulkner, Mike Lucock, Simon Gibbon, Catherine Hewitt, Elizabeth Hughes, Wajid Khan, Kiara Lewis, Bal Singh, Phil Walters and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gloria Roden-Lui *Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Guy FaulknerFaculty of Education, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Mike LucockDepartment of Nursing, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.
Simon GibbonArnold Lodge, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, England, United Kingdom.
Catherine HewittYork Trials Unit, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Elizabeth HughesDepartment of Nursing and Community Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Wajid KhanSouth West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Wakefield, United Kingdom.
Kiara LewisCentre for Life and Sport Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Bal SinghSouth West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Wakefield, United Kingdom.
Phil WaltersCreative Minds Charity, South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Wakefield, United Kingdom.
Judith WatsonYork Trials Unit, University of York, York, United Kingdom.
Tammi Walker *Department of Psychology, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In the UK, there are approximately 3500 individuals detained in medium secure service. Service users in such settings have complex and severe mental illness (SMI), often with co-morbid physical health problems, shorter life expectancy and low levels of physical activity (PA). However, there are few studies about PA interventions for medium secure service users in the United Kingdom. Therefore, the aim of the study was to co-produce, with medium secure service users and staff, the content and delivery of an intervention to increase PA. Methods: A feasibility and acceptability study were conducted to test the PA intervention using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation Behaviour Change Model (COM-B model) as the underpinning theoretical model. Both female and male service users, with personality disorder and/or mental illness, were recruited from two medium secure services in the UK.Outcome measures were collected at baseline, after the intervention and at follow up (3-months after intervention), and included PA levels, mental well-being, data on recruitment and retention and causes of drop out. Results: A total of 33 participants were recruited. Seven participants withdrew during the intervention period and 26 participants completed the PA intervention. During the follow up stage, three participants withdrew. Following the intervention participants increased PA and improved physical health and wellbeing. Overall, there was good retention for the PA intervention. Conclusion: Retention rates and completeness of data at both study sites indicate that it is feasible and acceptable to co-produce, deliver and maintain commitment to a PA intervention in such settings for service users with SMI. A future pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) will allow further understanding about the effectiveness of the PA intervention in medium secure psychiatric services. Clinical trial registration: https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN15546527, ISRCTN Registry - ISRCTN15546527.

Indexed as

COM-B model of behaviourco-productionfeasibility and acceptabilityintervention designphysical activitysecure psychiatric servicessevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID40778326
PMCPMC12329584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.