Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778319›Full record

ArticleToxicology reports2025

Analysing the acute toxicity of e-cigarette liquids and their vapour on human lung epithelial (A549) cells

Fern Findlay-Greene, Samantha Donnellan, Sharron Vass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Vaping-related lung disease: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fern Findlay-GreeneCentre for Biomedicine and Global Health, School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Sighthill Court, Edinburgh, Scotland EH11 4BN, UK.
Samantha DonnellanCentre for Biomedicine and Global Health, School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Sighthill Court, Edinburgh, Scotland EH11 4BN, UK.
Sharron VassCentre for Biomedicine and Global Health, School of Applied Sciences, Edinburgh Napier University, Sighthill Court, Edinburgh, Scotland EH11 4BN, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of alternative tobacco products such as vaping devices has significantly increased over the last 5-years, with the largest increase being amongst 18-25-year-olds. While the quantity of nicotine is tightly regulated, the composition of e-liquid flavourings is largely unregulated, and often absent from product labels. Herein, we compare the toxicity of carrier liquids propylene glycol (PG) & vegetable glycerine (VG) with five popular flavour concentrates: menthol, cherry, butterscotch, vanilla bourbon and tobacco on human alveolar type II cell-like A549 cells. The flavourings were tested in both liquid and vapour form and a vapour assay was developed to assess cytotoxicity of the flavourings. Our results conclude that menthol liquid was the most cytotoxic (LD

Indexed as

CytotoxicityE-cigarettesENDSLung cellsSecondary vapourVapingVaping flavourings

Identifiers

PMID40778319
PMCPMC12329099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.