ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2025
Effect of different breathing frequencies with breath-holding on muscle activity and coordination during butterfly swimming in national-level female swimmers.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Upper-Body Pitch Control Differentiates Sprint Butterfly Performance in Youth Swimmers: An IMU-Based Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of NMES Combined with Water-Based Resistance Training on Muscle Coordination in Freestyle Kick Movement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of different breathing frequencies with breath-holding on muscle activity and coordination during butterfly swimming in competitive swimmers. Eight national-level female swimmers participated in this study. They performed 25-m maximal butterfly swims with two breathing frequencies (task 1: swimming with the frontal breathing action for every stroke, and task 2: swimming while alternating the cycles with frontal breathing action and with breath-holding). From these tasks, the three different cycles (breathing cycle in task 1, breathing and breath-holding cycles in task 2) were analyzed. Surface electromyography was measured from 12 muscles of the right upper and lower limb, and trunk. A nonnegative factorization algorithm was used for muscle synergy analysis from the electromyographic data. Our results showed the activity timing for Triceps brachii, Deltoideus anterior, Latissimus dorsi, Biceps femoris and Gastrocnemius became earlier in the breath-holding cycle compared to those in the breathing cycle of task 1. However, the activity timing of all the muscles did not change between the breathing and breath-holding cycles of task 2. The number of muscle synergies was the same across the three cycles, except for one swimmer. The muscle combination of all the synergies was very similar across the three cycles. In contrast, the drive timing of the two synergies, which relate to the arm-pull movement and the first and second upward kicks, respectively, became earlier in the breath-holding cycle compared to those in the breathing cycle of task 1, while the drive timing did not change between the breathing and breath-holding cycles of task 2. These results suggest that the temporal characteristics of muscle activity and synergies are more influenced by different breathing frequencies than by frontal breathing action. Therefore, researchers should consider these effects when analyzing muscle activity during butterfly swimming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.