ReviewEndocrine oncology (Bristol, England)2025
Epidemiological insights and survival patterns in neuroendocrine neoplasia: a geographic perspective.
Review in Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroendocrine tumors: A tertiary care hospital study on clinicopathology features and prognosis.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Ileal neuroendocrine tumors: clinicopathological features and associations with systemic inflammatory and nutritional markers.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuroendocrine neoplasms, though rare, have shown marked increases in global incidence and prevalence over the past decade, as demonstrated by cancer registry data and studies from specialised tertiary centres. However, it remains unclear whether this represents a true increase in incidence or enhanced detection capabilities across various countries. This review aims to analyse and discuss recently published data on the worldwide epidemiology of gastroenteropancreatic NEN, and bronchopulmonary NEN and explore potential trends and differences in incidence rates between large and small nations according to demographics, primary sites, grade and stage. Following PRISMA guidelines, 59 cohort studies published between 2014 and 2024 were analysed. Findings reveal mixed demographic patterns, with a slight male predominance in overall NEN incidence but site-specific variations influenced by genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors. Median age at diagnosis is 60 years, though appendiceal NENs typically affect younger individuals. Racial disparities were noted, with higher incidence rates among Black populations in the USA, though findings varied across studies. Globally, the incidence of NENs has increased, with the most notable surge reported in the USA between 1973 and 2012. Similar upward trends were observed in Europe, Asia, and Australia, though to different extents. However, variations in data collection methods present significant challenges for cross-national comparisons. The review highlights the need for standardised methodologies and further research to address gaps in understanding NEN epidemiology in smaller nations and underrepresented regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.