Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778250›Full record

ReviewKorean journal of neurotrauma2025

Advancing Spine Fracture Detection: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice.

Seonghoon Jeong, Byung-Jou Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Korean journal of neurotrauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seonghoon JeongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7246-8564
Byung-Jou LeeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4030-3618

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebral fractures are prevalent skeletal injuries commonly associated with osteoporosis, trauma, and degenerative diseases. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial to prevent complications such as chronic pain and progressive spinal deformities. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool in medical imaging to support automatic detection and classification of vertebral fractures. This review provides an overview of AI-based approaches for spinal fracture diagnosis and summarizes recent advances in deep learning (DL) and machine learning (ML) models. The performance of AI models, mainly evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy metrics, varies with imaging modality and dataset size, with computed tomography-based models demonstrating superior diagnostic accuracy. In addition, AI-assisted workflows have been shown to improve diagnostic efficiency, reducing the time required for fracture detection. Despite these advances, challenges remain, such as dataset variability, the need for large-scale annotated datasets, and standardization of evaluation metrics. Future research should focus on improving model generalization, integrating multimodal imaging data, and validating AI applications in real-world clinical settings to further improve vertebral fracture diagnosis and patient management.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningDiagnostic imagingSpinal fractures

Identifiers

PMID40778250
PMCPMC12325887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.