ArticleEplasty2025
Technique to Reduce Wound Size: The Double-Opposing Purse-String and Horizontal Continuous Closure Algorithm.
Article in Eplasty, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical reconstruction of complex wounds requires considerable planning to ensure optimal patient outcomes. A conservative approach utilizing the lower tiers of the reconstructive ladder is preferred, especially in patients with comorbidities lending to a higher risk of poor wound healing. A simplified, low-risk solution with a double-opposing purse-string suture (PSS) and horizontal continuous closure technique may be particularly helpful in reducing the need for more complex techniques of wound reconstruction in select patient populations. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent reconstruction with the double-opposing PSS technique (N = 57) by the senior author (B.J.W.) at the University of Louisville between 2019 and 2022. Results: A total of 46 patients and 57 wounds underwent the double-opposing PSS and horizontal continuous closure technique as directed by the algorithm. The average defect size before and after was 61 and 12 cm Conclusions: This approach to wound closure demonstrates usefulness in reducing the size of or need for skin grafts in complex wound patients, particularly in those with comorbidities. The majority of patients underwent successful closure of their complex defects in various areas (eg, face, extremities) with this technique. Residual defects requiring skin graft allowed for a smaller graft and, thereby, donor site. Ultimately, this technique reduces the risk of complex complications by simplifying and reducing wound size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40778241PMC12331022What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.