Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778187›Full record

ArticleJournal of statistical theory and practice2025

More than presence-absence; modelling (e)DNA concentration across time and space from qPCR survey data.

Milly Jones, Eleni Matechou, Diana Cole, Alex Diana, Jim Griffin, Sara Peixoto, Lori Lawson Handley, Andrew Buxton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of statistical theory and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Milly JonesSchool of Mathematics, Statistics, and Actuarial Science, University of Kent, Cornwallis South, Canterbury, CT2 7NF Kent England.ORCID 0009-0003-2251-7916
Eleni MatechouSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS England.
Diana ColeSchool of Mathematics, Statistics, and Actuarial Science, University of Kent, Cornwallis South, Canterbury, CT2 7NF Kent England.
Alex DianaSchool of Mathematics, Statistics, and Actuarial Science, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ Essex England.
Jim GriffinDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT England.
Sara PeixotoSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX England.
Lori Lawson HandleyLake Ecosystems Group, UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP England.
Andrew BuxtonNatureSpace, 22 St Peter's Street, Stamford Lincolnshire, PE9 2PF England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) surveys offer a revolutionary approach to species monitoring by detecting DNA traces left by organisms in environmental samples, such as water and soil. These surveys provide a cost-effective, non-invasive, and highly sensitive alternative to traditional methods that rely on direct observation of species, especially for protected or invasive species. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is a technique used to amplify and quantify a targeted DNA molecule, making it a popular tool for monitoring focal species. Modelling of qPCR data has so far focused on inferring species presence/absence at surveyed sites. However, qPCR output is also informative regarding DNA concentration of the species in the sample, and hence, with the appropriate modelling approach, in the environment. In this paper, we introduce a modelling framework that infers DNA concentration at surveyed sites across time and space, and as a function of covariates, from qPCR output. Our approach accounts for contamination and inhibition in lab analyses, addressing biases particularly notable at low DNA concentrations, and for the inherent stochasticity in the corresponding data. Additionally, we incorporate heteroscedasticity in qPCR output, recognizing the increased variance of qPCR data at lower DNA concentrations. We validate our model through a simulation study, comparing its performance against models that ignore contamination/inhibition and variance heterogeneity. Further, we apply the model to three case studies involving aquatic and semi-aquatic species surveys in the UK. Our findings demonstrate improved accuracy and robustness in estimating DNA concentrations, offering a refined tool for ecological monitoring and conservation efforts. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42519-025-00477-9.

Indexed as

Bayesian ModellingEnvironmental DNAQuantitative PCR

Identifiers

PMID40778187
PMCPMC12325409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.