ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Prevalence of Risk Factors and Established Cardiovascular Disease Among All of Us Participants: Benchmarking Against National Estimates.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Knowing how demographics, cardiovascular risk factors and established cardiovascular disease (CVD) of All of Us (AoU) Research Program participants differ from the U.S population is important for cardiovascular researchers using these data, and to inform the generalizability of findings. Methods: We included AoU participants ≥18 years enrolled between May 2017-June 2022. 'AoU Survey' cohort included participants who completed the Personal and Family Health History survey. 'AoU EHR' included participants with linked EHR data. Cardiovascular risk factors and established CVD overall and by demographic sub-groups were compared to a weighted sample of adults ≥18 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-March 2020 cycle. Cardiovascular risk factors and established CVD were identified through survey questions in 'AoU Survey' and NHANES, and through SNOMED codes for 'AoU EHR'. Results: 'AoU Survey' (N=185,232) was older than NHANES (N=9,683 representing 248 million) (56±17 vs 48±18 years), with more female (60.4% vs 51.8%) and Black (18.6% vs 11.5%, all P <0.001) participants. Prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities in 'AoU Survey' was similar to NHANES overall, but lower when age stratified. However, this pattern was not observed among Black participants, who exhibited higher hypertension (42.2% vs 39%), diabetes (19.2% vs 12.5%), and congestive heart failure (3.8% vs 3.6%) rates than the U.S Black population. In contrast, female participants showed lower cardiovascular comorbidities. 'AoU EHR' with its code-based identification had higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities. Conclusion: AoU includes more historically underrepresented groups, as intended. However, researchers should account for differences in disease prevalence and subgroup characteristics with the U.S. population when interpreting survey estimates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.