ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
A Practical Introduction to Wavelet Analysis in Electroretinography.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To provide a conceptual understanding of the continuous and discrete wavelet transforms (CWT, DWT) for clinical electroretinography (ERG) analysis, and how these methods uncover time-frequency features that complement traditional time-domain analysis. Methods: A technical overview without the use of mathematical formula describing the basics of CWT and DWT and implementation considerations. We also review an example of four standard ISCEV ERG recordings from a healthy male (between 30-34 years of age) and a male (between 15-19 years of age) with complete congenital stationary night blindness (CSNB). Results: Wavelet analysis uncovered time-frequency signatures absent in raw traces. In light-adapted flicker, the normal ERG showed a ~30 Hz response with harmonics up to 90 Hz, whereas CSNB was largely attenuated. For LA 3 and dark-adapted flashes, normal CWTs concentrated energy < 100 Hz between 0.04-0.08 s, while CSNB demonstrated lowered or almost absent energy profiles in comparison. DWT indices exhibited a similar pattern, with normal recordings demonstrating high energy responses early in the 7, 15, and 29 Hz frequency bands, while CSNB registered markedly lower values. Conclusions: CWT and DWT provide complementary and objective insight into ERG responses. Open-source MATLAB toolkit and step-by-step tutorial provided herein lower technical barriers and enable use by the broader community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.