ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Long Read Genome Sequencing Elucidates Diverse Functional Consequences of Structural and Repeat Variation in Autism.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-read whole genome sequencing (LR-WGS) technologies enhance the discovery of structural variants (SVs) and tandem repeats (TRs). Application of LR-WGS has potential to identify novel risk factors that contribute to autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We performed LR-WGS on 243 individuals from 63 ASD families and generated an integrated call set combining long- and short-read data. LR-WGS increased detection of gene-disrupting SVs and TRs by 29% and 38%, respectively, and enabled identification of novel exonic
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.