ArticleCase reports in gastroenterology
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Hepatic Fluid Collections: Insights from a Case Series.
Article in Case reports in gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Hepatic cysts, commonly discovered incidentally, can become symptomatic due to complications like infection, rupture, or mass effect. Traditional management options include percutaneous drainage, open surgical or laparoscopic deroofing, and liver resection. We present a case series of 3 patients with complex fluid collections in the liver managed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage using lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) placement. While reports exist from other countries, our study contributes a series of cases from the USA. Case Presentation: Three patients, average age 75 years (two men, one woman), underwent EUS-guided drainage using LAMS for an infected liver cyst, infected liver hematoma within a hepatocellular carcinoma lesion, and a symptomatic simple liver cyst, respectively. All the hepatic fluid collections were in the left hepatic lobe and had an average diameter of 11 centimeters (cm). Only the female patient with a symptomatic cyst had prior percutaneous drainage. Successful LAMS placement was achieved in all cases. Clinical success, defined as cyst resolution or significant size reduction, was observed in all patients. The superinfected liver cyst showed complete resolution, yet the stent remained in place as the patient transitioned to hospice and subsequently passed away. In the case of the superinfected liver hematoma, the stent was removed after 2 months. No recurrence was observed in follow-up imaging 8 months later, and the patient passed away. The symptomatic simple liver cyst patient had the stent removed 15 months later, with no recurrence in imaging 11 months of post-stent removal. Conclusion: EUS-guided LAMS placement emerges as a less invasive and viable option for treating symptomatic and/or infected hepatic fluid collections compared to surgery or percutaneous drainage. While it may be a preferable choice in institutions with the requisite expertise, further studies are essential to establish its definitive role as a first-line intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.