Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778096›Full record

ArticleCase reports in gastroenterology

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage of Hepatic Fluid Collections: Insights from a Case Series.

Ankita Nekkanti, Harishankar Gopakumar, Muhammad Asghar, Manasa Kandula, Srinivas Puli

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ankita NekkantiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA.
Harishankar GopakumarDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA.
Muhammad AsgharDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA.
Manasa KandulaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA.
Srinivas PuliDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hepatic cysts, commonly discovered incidentally, can become symptomatic due to complications like infection, rupture, or mass effect. Traditional management options include percutaneous drainage, open surgical or laparoscopic deroofing, and liver resection. We present a case series of 3 patients with complex fluid collections in the liver managed by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage using lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) placement. While reports exist from other countries, our study contributes a series of cases from the USA. Case Presentation: Three patients, average age 75 years (two men, one woman), underwent EUS-guided drainage using LAMS for an infected liver cyst, infected liver hematoma within a hepatocellular carcinoma lesion, and a symptomatic simple liver cyst, respectively. All the hepatic fluid collections were in the left hepatic lobe and had an average diameter of 11 centimeters (cm). Only the female patient with a symptomatic cyst had prior percutaneous drainage. Successful LAMS placement was achieved in all cases. Clinical success, defined as cyst resolution or significant size reduction, was observed in all patients. The superinfected liver cyst showed complete resolution, yet the stent remained in place as the patient transitioned to hospice and subsequently passed away. In the case of the superinfected liver hematoma, the stent was removed after 2 months. No recurrence was observed in follow-up imaging 8 months later, and the patient passed away. The symptomatic simple liver cyst patient had the stent removed 15 months later, with no recurrence in imaging 11 months of post-stent removal. Conclusion: EUS-guided LAMS placement emerges as a less invasive and viable option for treating symptomatic and/or infected hepatic fluid collections compared to surgery or percutaneous drainage. While it may be a preferable choice in institutions with the requisite expertise, further studies are essential to establish its definitive role as a first-line intervention.

Indexed as

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainageEndoscopic ultrasound-guided therapyHepatic cbystHepatic fluid collectionLiver abscessLumen-apposing metal stentsMinimally invasive interventionTransduodenal stent placementTransgastric stent placement

Identifiers

PMID40778096
PMCPMC12331227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.