Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778079›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in urology2023

The interplay between bacterial biofilms, encrustation, and wall shear stress in ureteral stents: a review across scales.

Pedro Amado, Shaokai Zheng, Dirk Lange, Dario Carugo, Sarah L Waters, Dominik Obrist, Fiona Burkhard, Francesco Clavica

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Ultrasound-activated cilia for biofilm control in indwelling medical devices.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pedro AmadoARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Shaokai ZhengARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Dirk LangeThe Stone Centre at Vancouver General Hospital, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Dario CarugoNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sarah L WatersMathematical Institute, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Dominik ObristARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Fiona BurkhardDepartment of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Francesco ClavicaARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureteral stents are hollow tubes that are inserted into the ureter to maintain the flow of urine from the kidney to the bladder. However, the use of these indwelling stents is associated with potential complications. Biofilm, an organized consortium of bacterial species embedded within a self-producing extracellular matrix, can attach to the outer and inner surfaces of ureteral stents. Furthermore, encrustation - defined as the buildup of mineral deposits on the stent surface - can occur independently or in parallel with biofilm formation. Both phenomena can cause stent obstruction, which can lead to obstructive pyelonephritis and make stent removal difficult. Understanding the influence of flow on the development of biofilm and encrustation and the impact of small mechanical environmental changes (e.g., wall shear stress distribution) is key to improve the long-term performance of stents. Identifying the optimal stent properties to prevent early bacterial attachment and/or crystal deposition and their growth, would represent a breakthrough in reducing biofilm-/encrustation-associated complications. This review identifies the most prevalent bacterial strains and crystal types associated with ureteral stents, and the process of their association with the stent surface, which often depends on patient comorbidities, stent material, and indwelling time. Furthermore, we focus on the often-overlooked role of fluid dynamics on biofilm and encrustation development in ureteral stents, across a range of physical scales (i.e., from micro- to macro-scale) with the aim of providing a knowledge base to inform the development of safer and more effective ureteral stents.

Indexed as

bacteriabiofilmencrustationfluid mechanicsmicrofluidicsureteral stentsurologywall shear stress

Identifiers

PMID40778079
PMCPMC12327240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.