Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778038›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in urology2023

The role of bowel for minimally invasive treatment of stricture disease.

Shane Kronstedt, Alain Kaldany, Hiren V Patel, Sammy E Elsamra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shane KronstedtDivision of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Alain KaldanyDivision of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Hiren V PatelDivision of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.
Sammy E ElsamraDivision of Urology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of urinary tract stricture disease has evolved over the last several decades, with robotic surgery representing a bourgeoning method for urologic reconstruction. Conventionally, proximal and mid-ureteral strictures, as well as lengthy urethral strictures, have presented a challenge for surgeons to create tension-free repairs. Options for repair include endoscopic dilation, endopyelotomy, ureteroplasty or pyeloplasty, and urethroplasty. Small and large bowel can be incorporated into various urinary tract stricture repairs. Their use has proven successful in reconstructing both upper and lower urinary tract strictures and offers flexibility for complex cases such as lengthy or multifocal strictures. While the use of bowel, most notably the appendix, for stricture repair is not a novel concept, a growing body of evidence supports its use with minimally invasive robotic approaches. In addition, there has been a substantial amount of recent data suggesting low rates of postoperative complications and long progression-free survival after robotic stricture repair using small bowel or rectum. We present a comprehensive review of literature outlining the role of the small bowel, appendix, and rectum in the minimally invasive repair of urinary tract stricture disease, as well as a description of the various techniques employed.

Indexed as

appendixbowelgenitourinary reconstructionrobotic surgerystricture

Identifiers

PMID40778038
PMCPMC12327288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.