Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778023›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in urology2023

Bladder irrigation with tap water to reduce antibiotic treatment for catheter-associated urinary tract infections: an evaluation of clinical practice.

Felice E E van Veen, Stefan Den Hoedt, Rosa L Coolen, Jessica Boekhorst, Jeroen R Scheepe, Bertil F M Blok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Felice E E van VeenDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Stefan Den HoedtDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Rosa L CoolenDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jessica BoekhorstDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jeroen R ScheepeDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Bertil F M BlokDepartment of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) is a common complication among patients with urinary catheters and is often treated with antibiotics. With increasing rates of antibiotic resistance, it is necessary to explore alternative treatment options for CAUTIs. The aims of this study were 1) to assess the efficacy and treatment satisfaction of bladder irrigation (BI) with tap water to prevent and treat CAUTIs, 2) and to evaluate the current use of BI for CAUTIs among Dutch clinicians. Methods: The first part of this study consisted of a cross-sectional study among patients with intermittent or indwelling catheters who performed BI with tap water between March 2020 and May 2021. Efficacy, treatment satisfaction, and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) were assessed using questionnaires. Outcomes were compared between neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) and non-NLUTD patients. Factors associated with overall treatment satisfaction were determined using logistic regression analysis. Second, a nationwide survey of Dutch clinicians was conducted to evaluate the current use of BI for CAUTIs. Results: A total of 99 patients who were performing BI for at least three months were included. The median age was 61.9 years, 41.4% had NLUTD, and 72.2% performed BI >1 year. The majority of both NLUTD (65.9%) and non-NLUTD patients (68.4%) were (very) satisfied with BI. Women had higher odds of reporting higher satisfaction and each additional CAUTI decreased the odds. Most NLUTD (85.4%) and non-NLUTD (65.5%) patients reported an improvement on the PGI-I with a difference in favour of NLUTD patients (p=0.002). In addition, 40.4% of the patients had no CAUTI, and 59.6% reported 1.39 (SD 2.06) CAUTIs. Only half of these self-reported CAUTIs were treated with antibiotics. In addition, 33 (58.9%) clinicians used BI for CAUTIs, of which ten used tap water as irrigation agent. Discussion: This study provides first evidence supporting the efficacy of BI with tap water in the treatment of CAUTIs and reducing the use of antibiotics. Patients are overall satisfied and experience improvement in their condition with BI. In addition, the majority of the surveyed Dutch clinicians use BI for CAUTIs. However, irrigation with tap water is still not widely used.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistanceantibioticsbladder irrigationcatheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI)intermittent urethral catheterizationneurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD)tap waterurinary catheterization

Identifiers

PMID40778023
PMCPMC12327337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.