Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778013›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025

Experiences of Social Media Users with Over the Counter Red Light Therapy Devices.

Erum N Ilyas, Alexander J Barna, Alexis Arza, Carolyn Giordano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erum N IlyasAll authors are with the Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Alexander J BarnaAll authors are with the Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Alexis ArzaAll authors are with the Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Carolyn GiordanoAll authors are with the Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rising popularity of over-the-counter red-light therapy (RLT) devices has sparked interest in their efficacy and consumer behavior, particularly as they are increasingly promoted on social media. This cross-sectional study analyzed responses from a survey of 226 participants, with 88.5 percent identifying as female and 83.6 percent of Hispanic or Latino origin. The majority (60.4%) reported learning about RLT devices through social media, and 90.0 percent were willing to purchase one, with most respondents willing to spend between $101 to $300 USD (48.9%). The top motivations for use included anti-aging (50.2%), improving skin texture (37.9%), and reducing dark spots (30.8%). Significant associations were found between Hispanic ethnicity, male gender, and increasing age with a higher likelihood of considering RLT devices (

Indexed as

light therapyPhototherapyred light therapysocial mediasurvey

Identifiers

PMID40778013
PMCPMC12327556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.