ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2025
Improving Molluscum Treatment Options: Overcoming the Challenge of Poor Adherence.
Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reverse vaccinology and immunoinformatics identify multi-epitope vaccine candidates against molluscum contagiosum virus.Biology methods & protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis review aims to understand medication adherence and its influence on efficacy for existing and novel topical treatments for molluscum contagiosum.
methodsA PubMed search was performed on clinical studies from 2000 to 2023 assessing adherence and treatment efficacy for topical and non-topical therapies used to treat molluscum.
resultsAdherence to individual topical treatments for molluscum is poor and limits their utility in clinical practice, despite demonstrated safety, painless administration, and advantages for pediatric and home use. Studies suggested lower adherence for topical rather than procedural treatments due to delayed effects, long treatment duration, and uncertain perceived benefits. New topical agents, VP-102 (ie, cantharidin 0.7% drug-device combination) and SB206 (ie, berdazimer gel 10.3%), showed promising efficacy in clinical trials, but their ability to address adherence is unclear. LIMITATIONS: There is a lack of sufficient clinical studies on topical medications for molluscum contagiosum, limiting our overall understanding of adherence and practical efficacy.
conclusionSeveral studies suggest that commonly used topical medications for molluscum suffer from poor adherence, reducing treatment efficacy. Addressing adherence to these medications may promote the utility of topicals to deliver the need for safe, painless, and efficacious treatments for molluscum. Larger, well-designed trials accounting for adherence are needed before evidence-based treatment recommendations can be made for topical molluscum treatments. Our findings propose that in-office topicals like cantharidin may overcome nonadherence and enhance efficacy compared to daily home-administered topical medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40778008PMC12327560What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.