ArticleAfrican health sciences2024
Assessment of foot care practice among adults with diabetes mellitus in Ogbomoso, Nigeria.
Article in African health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) has steadily increased as also the number of people bearing its complications. One of such complications is diabetic foot disease. Foot care is an integral part of diabetes self-care and preventive strategy for reduction of diabetic foot disease and ultimate amputation. Aim: To assess foot care practices among adults with diabetes mellitus accessing care at the Out-patient Clinic of the Bowen University Teaching Hospital, Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study comprising of 384 adults aged 18 years and above with diabetes mellitus of at least 6 months duration. A systematic sampling technique was used to recruit the participants for this study. Nottingham Assessment of Functional Foot Care (NAFFC) was used to assess the foot care practices of the participants. Data analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23. Results: Of the 384 participants recruited for the study, 321 (83.6%) had good foot care practice and 63 (16.4%) had poor foot care practice. Gender, level of education and medication use had significant association with foot care practice. Conclusion: Foot care practice was good in majority of the participants in this study. As such, clinicians need to be consistent in providing self-foot care practice education to prevent diabetic foot diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.