Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40777940›Full record

SynthesisAfrican health sciences2024

Attitudes of medical students towards abortion and their willingness to perform abortion: meta-analysis.

Jian-Xin Hu, Rui Chang, Jian-Qing Du, Min He

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in African health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jian-Xin HuSchool of Nursing and Health, Xi'an Innovation College, Yan'an University, Xi'an, Shannxi 710100, China.
Rui ChangSchool of Nursing and Health, Xi'an Innovation College, Yan'an University, Xi'an, Shannxi 710100, China.
Jian-Qing DuSchool of Nursing and Health, Xi'an Innovation College, Yan'an University, Xi'an, Shannxi 710100, China.
Min HeSchool of Nursing and Health, Xi'an Innovation College, Yan'an University, Xi'an, Shannxi 710100, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This study evaluates the opinion of medical students about abortion and their willingness to perform the abortion. Methods: After a systematic review, meta-analyses of proportions were performed to achieve percent estimates of medical students' opinions about abortion and willingness to perform the abortion. Results: 15 studies appraising 6341 medical students were included. Most medical students opined that abortion should be provided if the mother's life is threatened (89%), in case of rape (84%), if the mother's mental health is affected (79%), if the fetus is seriously defective (73%); and on mother's request (37%). Medical students informed that they would perform abortion if the mother's life is threatened (87%); in case of rape (77%); if the fetus is seriously defective (78%); if the mother's mental health is threatened (65%); in case of teenage pregnancy (51%); on mother's request (25%); and if court rules (19%). Religiosity was associated with significantly lower proabortion (favoring legalization of abortion) attitudes of medical students (OR: 0.10 [95% CI: 0.04, 0.24]; p<0.00001) but longer duration of medical education was associated with higher proabortion attitudes (OR: 1.75 [95% CI: 1.42, 2.14]; p<0.00001). Conclusion: Attitudes of medical students towards abortion are generally ambivalent where the majority opine that abortion should be performed under certain circumstances.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAttitude of Health PersonnelStudents, MedicalFemaleHumansPregnancyAbortionattitudesmedical studentsopinion

Identifiers

PMID40777940
PMCPMC12327135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.