Fast-track surgery applied in gynecological oncological surgical treatment: a prospective randomized trial.

Xunwei Shi, Ling Cui, Yu Shi, Guonan Zhang, Zhirong Yang, Dengfeng Wang

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial

In one paragraph

Trial report in African health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xunwei ShiDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.

Ling CuiDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.

Yu ShiDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.

Guonan ZhangDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.

Zhirong YangDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.

Dengfeng WangDepartment of Gynaecological Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to compare the fast-track and traditional gynaecological oncological surgeries from postoperative recovery. Methods: A total of 107 patients undergoing gynaecological oncological surgery were randomly assigned to the FTS group (n=50) and the traditional group (n=57). Results: No significant differences in LOS (Length of hospitalization post-operation) were observed. A less total cost of hospitalization and a lower C-Reactive protein (CRP) level were found (P < 0.05). Also, the trial revealed a significantly lower number of the overall complications in the FTS Group (P < 0.05). Conclusions: FTS applied in gynaecological oncological surgeries is beneficial to patients in terms of the postoperative recovery.

Indexed as

Genital Neoplasms, FemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresLength of StayAdultAgedC-Reactive ProteinFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeC-Reactive Proteinfast track surgerygynaecological surgeryoncological surgerypost-operative length of hospitalizationrandomised controlled study

Identifiers

PMID40777928

DOI10.4314/ahs.v24i3.32

PMCPMC12327132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.