ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology case reports2025
Finger's continuous bipedicle conjunctival flap.
Article in American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To describe a bipedicle conjunctival flap technique that offered symmetrical, thus structurally stabile, double-vascularized ocular surface reconstruction. Principal results: A unilateral, inferior, severe corneal neovascularization with subepithelial fibrosis and partial limbal stem cell deficiency evolved over 1 year, covering 270 degrees of the cornea. There was no history of ocular trauma, chemical injury, pharmacologic drops, prior incisional conjunctival or retinal surgery. Ophthalmic oncology and uveitis evaluations were negative. Due to progressive covering of the visual axis, an excisional biopsy followed by a novel "bucket-handle" bipedicle conjunctival flap was performed. Superior bulbar conjunctiva was mobilized and advanced to cover the entire defect and sewn to the margin of conjunctival resection. Then, a central conjunctival corneal window was resected to expose the cornea and allow for vision. However, it also allowed for one continuous, vascularized conjunctival nasal to temporal pedicle flap. Major conclusion: A "bucket-handle" conjunctival flap provided a continuous bipedicle, arcuate tissue replacement, and a structurally stable barrier to conjunctival regrowth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.