ArticleDigital health
Usability assessment of a digital tool to enhance person-clinician communication in the memory clinic: An expert evaluation.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: From a human-centred design perspective, the web-based tool 'Helder in Gesprek' (Clear in Conversation) has recently been developed to improve person-centred communication in the memory clinic. The aim was to conduct expert testing to identify potential usability issues prior to user-testing and propose corresponding re-design recommendations. Methods: The DEMIGNED principles, specifically developed to identify potential usability issues for people with dementia, are used during the expert evaluation. Five experts ( Results: Applying the DEMIGNED principles led to the discovery of 42 unique usability problems, related to cognitive principles ( Conclusion: We identified several unique usability problems across a variety of DEMIGNED principles before usability testing with actual end-users that need to be addressed during re-design. Designers, researchers, clinicians, and policy makers may use these results to improve the usability of web-based tools, thus improving person-centred communication in the memory clinic for people with cognitive complaints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.