Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40777834›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Poisoning accidents in young children-Theory-based evaluation of an mHealth app.

Patricia Müller, Annett Schulze, Johanna Geppert, Axel Menning, Fabian Brand, Paula Stehr, Doreen Reifegerste, Constanze Rossmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patricia MüllerDepartment Risk Communication, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5764-2818
Annett SchulzeDepartment Risk Communication, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8159-9021
Johanna GeppertDepartment Risk Communication, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6354-7706
Axel MenningDepartment Biological Safety, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6905-5614
Fabian BrandDepartment Risk Communication, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7316-8168
Paula StehrDepartment of Media and Communication, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0767-8335
Doreen ReifegersteSchool of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8961-7220
Constanze RossmannDepartment of Media and Communication, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4068-4369

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Unintentional childhood injuries such as poisonings are prevalent among young children and can have severe or even fatal consequences. As most of these injuries happen in and around the home, parents and other caregivers need to be prepared to prevent and deal with them. mHealth apps are promising for this, since regular smartphone use is widespread. This study evaluated the German app "Vergiftungsunfälle bei Kindern" ( Methods: Parents ( Results: The mean usability score was 77.6 ± 15.7 out of 100. Most participants reported they trust the app and would use it in specific situations. The general app structure was perceived as clear. Perceived usefulness was facilitated by education on childhood injuries and contact to the poison control center, whereas it was impaired by the perception that the app impedes learning and rapid action in critical situations. Major obstacles included a reduced comprehensibility in terms of text design, visualizations, and complex language, all causing high time expenditure. Moreover, while some participants wished for condensed information, others expressed the need for more detailed explanations. Conclusion: The results indicate that the intention to use the app was high, but its perceived ease of use and usefulness could be further enhanced by a better tailoring to different needs of caregivers.

Indexed as

caregiversdigital healthevaluationmHealthmobile apppoisoningusability

Identifiers

PMID40777834
PMCPMC12329195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.