Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40777828›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Intersectionality, equity-mindedness, and access to care.

Naomi W Nishi, Erin Watley, Mary Jane Collier, Gabriela I Morales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Naomi W NishiCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Erin WatleyDepartment of Communication and Cinema, McDaniel College, Westminster, MD, United States.
Mary Jane CollierCollege of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Department of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Gabriela I MoralesDepartment of Communication Studies, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The factors that contribute to an individual's and/or community's access to veterinary care for their animal(s) are manifold. While some (potential) clients must navigate barriers, including transportation options, time off during business hours, physical access, cost of care, and language barriers, there are also identity factors and experiences that affect access to veterinary care particularly for people whose identities are marginalized. These include clients experiencing distrust and/or disrespect in their interactions with veterinary professionals. We explore how intersectionality affects access to veterinary care, especially for those who are multiply marginalized by societal systems of oppression. We share research findings on the experiences of clients that identify as women of color and/or non-binary people of color that have had to navigate barriers to their access to veterinary care, including through broken trust and experienced disrespect. We then define and propose strategies for engaging intersectional equity-mindedness in clinical practice. We connect these concepts of intersectionality and equity-mindedness to their implications for access to care.

Indexed as

access to careequity-mindednessgenderintersectional equity-mindednessintersectionalityraceveterinary care

Identifiers

PMID40777828
PMCPMC12328138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.