Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40777659›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Epidemiological investigation of infectious occupational exposure among dental students in a stomatological teaching hospital: a cross-sectional study.

Na Tang, Si He, Sha Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Na TangChangsha Stomatological Hospital, Changsha, China.
Si HeChangsha Stomatological Hospital, Changsha, China.
Sha LiChangsha Stomatological Hospital, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the infectious occupational exposure status and related factors in stomatological hospital students. Methods: The infectious occupational exposure data reported by students in Changsha Stomatological Hospital from 2019 to 2023 were collected and analyzed from three aspects: basic situation, exposure situation and emergency treatment after exposure. Results: A total of 1,151 students were investigated from 2019 to 2023, and 48 of them had infectious occupational exposure, with an occupational exposure rate of 4.17%. Interns (6.44%) had the highest rate of occupational exposure to infectious diseases, and most of the exposures were related to handling medical waste (62.50%) and puncture wounds by hollow needles (70.83%). Maxillofacial surgery (54.17%) was the department with the highest proportion of students with infectious occupational exposure. The investigation showed that although none of the exposed students were infected after follow-up, 56.25% of the students still did not receive proper emergency treatment after infectious occupational exposure, and 16.67% of the students did not receive timely report after exposure. Conclusion: Dental students have a high risk of occupational exposure to infectious diseases, so it is very important to strengthen their occupational protection awareness and operational skills, standardize the emergency treatment measures and reporting procedures of students after occupational exposure, and ensure the correct treatment and reporting of dental students after occupational exposure.

Indexed as

Hospitals, TeachingOccupational ExposureStudents, DentalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultdental studenthospital infectioninfectious occupational exposureoccupational exposurestomatology department

Identifiers

PMID40777659
PMCPMC12328413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.