ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
Funding the future: safeguarding pediatric health equity through CMS and CHIP.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric health disparities remain widespread among marginalized populations, driven by structural racism, poverty, and unequal access to care. While the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) have advanced equity in pediatric healthcare, ongoing threats to federal funding jeopardize this progress. This commentary examines five articles, including four CMS-funded interventions that address pediatric health inequities by targeting key social determinants of health (SDoH), including access to care, neighborhood conditions, and insurance coverage. Interventions reviewed include Functional Family Therapy (FFT) for adjudicated youth, a hospital-led asthma management initiative in Ohio, community-based care engagement strategies in disorganized Chicago neighborhoods, and a national policy analysis of CHIP's effectiveness. Across these studies, common themes emerged: community engagement, cross-sector collaboration, and expanded insurance access improved outcomes and reduced costs. Medicaid expansion reduced in-hospital mortality and improved access to rehabilitative care, while CHIP increased preventive service use among near-poor children. However, persistent barriers-including racial and geographic inequities-continue to limit care engagement. While pediatric healthcare research has moved beyond disparity detection, implementation of targeted, evidence-based interventions remains limited. Without sustained investment in CMS and CHIP, the infrastructure supporting equitable pediatric care may erode, exacerbating health gaps for the most vulnerable. Policymakers must prioritize funding and support for initiatives that integrate medical, social, and structural solutions to pediatric health disparities. Strengthening CMS-supported programs is essential not only for improving child health outcomes but also for reducing long-term healthcare costs and advancing pediatric health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.