ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Negotiating household heat: thermal labor, energy justice, and women's health in Nepal's Madhesh Province.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Training under planetary risk: planetary health ethics in clinical education and governance.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Household cooking with solid fuels exposes women to prolonged indoor heat levels that routinely exceed internationally accepted occupational safety thresholds; yet, this exposure remains largely absent from climate-health analyses. This perspective article introduces the concept of thermal labor-the physiological strain, time cost, and health risks associated with performing domestic work under chronically elevated kitchen temperatures-and argues that such exposure constitutes an overlooked driver of gendered health inequities in Nepal's Madhesh Province. Methods: Evidence was synthesized from national temperature records, caste-disaggregated census data, spot measurements conducted by the Nepal Health Research Council, and illustrative intervention studies from South Asia and Africa. The policy context was examined through Nepal's Nationally Determined Contribution, the Clean Cooking Alliance Nepal Country Action Plan, and the National Disaster Risk Legislation. Results: The synthesis suggests that accelerated warming in Nepal's lowlands and caste-linked reliance on biomass fuels result in daily indoor heat exposures. Prior studies associate such exposures with appetite suppression, reduced dietary diversity, and increased time burdens for women who manage household cooking. These established pathways, when considered alongside the socioeconomic profile of Dalit households in Madhesh, indicate a heightened but under-documented risk for this group. Nepal's existing target of achieving electric cooking adoption in 31.5 percent of households by 2035 offers a practical policy lever for reducing thermal exposure and its associated health and equity impacts. Discussion: Positioning thermal labor as a measurable health determinant broadens the clean-cooking agenda beyond smoke reduction to encompass heat mitigation, nutrition, and gender equity. A balanced approach is proposed: sentinel kitchen-heat surveillance within existing household surveys would establish exposure baselines; thermal-performance criteria in stove-procurement standards could translate policy commitments into verifiable outcomes; and integrating heat indicators into clean-cooking and disaster-risk frameworks would facilitate coordinated action. These steps would convert domestic heat from an invisible stressor into a tractable public health target, illustrating how a single intervention pathway can advance climate, energy, and equity goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.