ArticleFrontiers in urology2025
Unclassifiable renal carcinoma with medullary phenotype and SMARCB1 deficiency: case report.
Article in Frontiers in urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is an aggressive tumor representing less than 0.5% of renal cell carcinomas (RCC), and it is considered rare. When it occurs, patients typically have sickle cell trait, sickle cell disease, or an associated hemoglobinopathy, which is a necessary characteristic for diagnosis. Additionally, RMC is characterized by the inactivation of alterations in the SMARCB1 (INI1) tumor suppressor gene, resulting in the loss of INI1 immunohistochemical expression. However, there are tumors reported in the literature with the same morphological and phenotypic characteristics as RMC but without hemoglobinopathy, referred to as "unclassified RCC with medullary phenotype." Case report: We present the 13th case of unclassified renal cell carcinoma with a medullary phenotype in a 20-year-old woman. The patient was admitted with complaints of macroscopic hematuria, with no significant findings on physical examination. Diagnostic investigation included a computed tomography urogram, which revealed a hypovascular oval image with central cystic/necrotic areas in the middle third of the right kidney, measuring 32 mm, suggesting a possible diagnosis of an infected renal cyst. Subsequent magnetic resonance imaging showed findings consistent with an atypical presentation of primary neoplasia in the differential diagnosis, prompting a renal biopsy for case definition. Histopathological analysis revealed a high-grade infiltrative epithelioid neoplasm. Immunohistochemistry showed positivity for PAX8 and loss of INI-1 expression. No hemoglobinopathies were identified in the patient, in this context, the neoplasm is appropriately classified as unclassified renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with medullary phenotype and SMARCB1 deficiency. The instituted therapy consisted of right radical nephrectomy with retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy, with nodal metastases detected. Conclusion: Given the rarity of unclassified RCC with a medullary phenotype, continuous documentation and analysis of individual cases not associated with sickle cell trait are crucial to understanding its behavior, prognosis, and potential therapeutic approaches, considering its aggressiveness and high metastatic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.