ArticleFrontiers in urology2025
Care-associated adverse events related to the use of laser in urological interventions: the French experience.
Article in Frontiers in urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The use of laser in urology is increasing, especially in renal stones and benign prostatic hypertrophy. Despite the interest in this technology on improving surgical management, several adverse events may result. This work collates French reports of care-associated adverse events (CAEs) resulting from lasers used in urological interventions. Materials and methods: This is a collection of CAEs between May 2016 and December 2023 declared by urologists involved in accreditation throughout France. These CAEs were classified according to five levels of severity. They have been described and classified according to the ALARM protocol. The statistics were mainly descriptive. Fisher's exact test and Student's Results: Between May 2016 and December 2023, between the 1,376 declared events, 149 laser-related CAEs were reported in urological interventions. Five CAEs (3.4%) were classified as grade 3, and six CAEs (4%) were classified as grade 4. All the other CAEs were between grades 1 and 2 with negligible consequences. The immediate reported causes of laser AEs were the clinical complexity of the case (7.38%), the technical gesture (14.1%), patient information (24.83%), material (38.25%), and medications (15.43%). Incidents caused by problems in material seem to be more frequent in younger patients ( Conclusion: In France, 7.4% of CAEs related to the use of laser in urological surgery are of major to critical severity. Training teams on the use of laser generators and providing feedback on functional results and related specific morbidity seem necessary to guarantee the proper use of these technologies and the safety of staff and patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.