Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40777596›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in rehabilitation sciences2025

Plea for routine endoscopic tracheostomy tube adjustment.

Bettina Otto, Regina Lindemann, Holger Kirsch, Matthias Schmid, Hartmut Vatter, Christiane Braun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bettina OttoEarly Rehabilitation Department, Neurological Rehabilitation Center Godeshöhe, Bonn, Germany.
Regina LindemannEarly Rehabilitation Department, Neurological Rehabilitation Center Godeshöhe, Bonn, Germany.
Holger KirschEarly Rehabilitation Department, Neurological Rehabilitation Center Godeshöhe, Bonn, Germany.
Matthias SchmidInstitute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology (IMBIE), University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Hartmut VatterDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Christiane BraunEarly Rehabilitation Department, Neurological Rehabilitation Center Godeshöhe, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Tracheostomy is one of the standard procedures in intensive care medicine. In the context of tracheostomy tube-, dysphagia- and decannulation management the selection of the appropriate tracheostomy tube model (angle, diameter, length) is crucial for the proper placement in the trachea. In spite of recent guidelines mentioning endoscopic control of the tube placement as a useful measure, data regarding the proper placement are rare in the present literature. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the accuracy of tracheostomy tube placement in patients admitted to our early neurological rehabilitation center. Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center analysis of all patients with tracheostomy tube admitted to our early neurological rehabilitation center between 12/2022 and 01/2024. We analyzed the frequency, type and extent of injuries caused by a suboptimal placement of the tracheostomy tubes. The location of the tubes was routinely controlled endoscopically upon admission. In total 327 tracheoscopies were carried out. Clinical characteristics were collected in all patients and the endoscopic results were divided into malpositioned tracheostomy tubes (non-central tube position, often causing mucosal lesions, ulcer, bleeding) vs. well-positioned (central or almost central) tubes. The association between the quality of the tracheostomy tube placement and the characteristics age, gender, main diagnosis, tracheostomy procedure, time until initial endoscopic control of tracheostomy tube fitting after admission and after tracheostomy were analyzed using a logistic regression model. Results: A total of 214 examinations (65%) revealed a malpositioned tracheostomy tube. In 19% of the carried out tracheoscopies (327), manifest injuries were already detectable (mucosal lesion, ulcer, bleeding). 113 examinations (35%) showed an acceptable tube placement. We found no association between the quality of the tracheostomy tube position and gender, age, main diagnosis, time until initial endoscopic control of tube fitting or type of tracheostomy. Discussion: Since we found a high percentage of suboptimal tracheostomy tube positions (65%), an increased risk of complications can be assumed. With a view to the most relevant late complication of tracheal stenosis, there is agreement that the fundamental lesion begins with mucosal ulceration, which we found in 19% of the investigations. Therefore, the present data strongly suggest that a routine endoscopic control of tracheostomy tube placement should be firmly implemented into the routine tracheostomy tube management. Our data further suggest that the supply with tracheostomy tubes needs to be optimized.

Indexed as

decannulationtracheal cannula managementtracheal lesiontracheoscopytracheostomy tube adjustment

Identifiers

PMID40777596
PMCPMC12328300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.