ArticleMethodsX2025
Explainable forecasting of air quality index using a hybrid random forest and ARIMA model.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Missing data imputation in hourly CO measurements for air quality monitoring: a case study in the city of Salvador, Brazil.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2026Article
- Air quality index prediction using a hybrid CEEMDAN-CNN-IGWO-BiGRU-Attention model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Analysis of medical costs and two-model prediction for patients with severe mental disorders in Gansu Province, China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A hybrid physics-informed neural and explainable AI approach for scalable and interpretable AQI predictions.MethodsX · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and interpretable prediction of the Air Quality Index (AQI) is critical for public health decision-making and environmental policy enforcement. This study presents a hybrid forecasting framework that combines the strengths of Random Forest Regression (RFR) and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) models to improve AQI prediction accuracy while maintaining model transparency. The RFR captures nonlinear relationships among pollutants, while ARIMA is used to model the temporal patterns in RFR residuals, forming a two-stage learning architecture. The model is trained and evaluated on multi-year AQI data from India and validated using an expanding window cross-validation strategy to maintain temporal integrity. To ensure transparency and interpretability, the study employs SHAP ((SHapley Additive Explanations) to uncover the influence of key pollutants such as PM₂.₅, NO₂, and SO₂. Additionally, Ljung-Box diagnostics and uncertainty bands are used to validate model adequacy. Compared to baseline models, the hybrid approach achieves lower Mean Squared Error (MSE = 508.46) and a higher R² score (0.94), confirming improved generalization. This research contributes a replicable, explainable, and efficient AQI forecasting framework suited for deployment in resource-constrained urban environments. The method comprises of: Residual learning hybrid model: Random Forest for prediction + ARIMA for residual correction Time-aware validation using expanding window cross-validation Model interpretability through SHAP analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.