ArticleJournal of anesthesia and translational medicine2024
The environmental effects of anesthetic agents and anesthesia practices.
Article in Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systemic fragility in European total intravenous anesthesia delivery and opportunities for resilient real-time decision support.Communications medicine · 2026Review
- Balancing peri-operative anaesthesia: Financial efficiency and quality surgical outcomes.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Sedation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: From Drug-Centered Protocols to Personalized, Technology-Supported Pathways: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Comparison of two sevoflurane formulations in low-flow anesthesia: a retrospective observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Observational
- General Anesthetics: Aspects of Chirality, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacokinetics.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anesthesia is a critical domain with considerable capacity to reduce the carbon footprint of healthcare on the environment, particularly in terms of climate change. Volatile anesthetics are halogenated gases that function as potent greenhouse gases and contribute to the greenhouse effect, depletion of the ozone layer, and progression of global warming. However, the use of volatile anesthetics can be decreased significantly through the adoption of more environmentally conscious practices. Regional anesthesia, including intravenous and neuraxial anesthesia, reduces the harmful effects of inhaled anesthetics and has shown to have positive perioperative effects in certain patient populations. Combining total intravenous anesthesia with target-controlled infusion results in optimized infusion rates, thereby reducing both anesthetic use and waste. Techniques such as processed electroencephalogram monitoring can be used to assess the sedation of a patient and prevent over-anesthetizing and consequently decreasing anesthetic use, which may contribute to improved surgical outcomes. Additionally, actively promoting education on low-flow administration practices can enhance the recycling of anesthetic gases and decrease the release of volatile anesthetics into the atmosphere, thereby reducing the carbon footprint of this field. Finally, by refining existing techniques and scavenging systems, xenon, with its physiological stability and minimal environmental impact, could emerge as a leading inhaled anesthetic agent in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.