ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Efficient Grammar Compression via RLZ-based RePair.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Among grammar-based compression techniques, RePair is a notable offline encoding scheme known for its simplicity and powerful combinatorial properties, producing compact grammars by repeatedly replacing the most frequent adjacent pairs of symbols, known as bigrams. However, RePair's memory usage scales poorly with input size, as it loads the entire text into memory. In contrast, Relative Lempel-Ziv (RLZ) parsing offers a scalable and lightweight online encoding scheme that losslessly represents a text in terms of phrases that refer to a reference string, but it often fails to expose deeper structural patterns. We introduce an algorithm that produces a RePair grammar from the RLZ parse of the input, leveraging the strengths of both methods. Our method, RLZ-RePair, performs bigram replacements systematically, preserving the integrity of the RLZ phrases throughout the RePair iterations. When the reference is well chosen, our method achieves the same grammar as standard RePair while significantly reducing both memory usage and the number of bigram replacements. In particular, we show that RLZ-RePair uses significantly less memory than RePair, which required between 18% and 480% more memory across different data sets. To our knowledge, RLZ-RePair is one of the first scalable methods that constructs exact RePair grammars, resulting in a grammar-based compressor that is both practical for large datasets and faithful to the theoretical elegance of RePair.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.