ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Facilitating analysis of open neurophysiology data on the DANDI Archive using large language model tools.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The DANDI Archive is a key resource for sharing open neurophysiology data, hosting over 400 datasets in the Neurodata Without Borders (NWB) format. While these datasets hold tremendous potential for reanalysis and discovery, many researchers face barriers to reuse, including unfamiliarity with access methods and difficulty identifying relevant content. Here we introduce an AI-powered, agentic chat assistant and a notebook generation pipeline. The chat assistant serves as an interactive tool for exploring DANDI datasets. It leverages large language models (LLMs) and integrates with agentic tools to guide users through data access, visualization, and preliminary analysis. The notebook generator analyzes dataset structure with minimal human input, executing inspection scripts and generating visualizations. It then produces an instructional Python notebook tailored to the dataset. We applied this system to 12 recent datasets. Review by neurophysiology data specialists found the generated notebooks to be generally accurate and well-structured, with most notebooks rated as "very helpful." This work demonstrates how AI can support FAIR principles by lowering barriers to data reuse and engagement.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.