Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40777221›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Is a single calibration for the TloadDback cognitive fatigue induction task reliable?

Jeromy Michael Hrabovecky, Xavier De Tiège, Chloé Samyn, Guillermo Borragán, Philippe Peigneux, Mélanie Strauss, Hichem Slama

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jeromy Michael HraboveckyLaboratoire de Neuroanatomie et Neuroimagerie Translationnelles (LN2T), UNI-ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Xavier De TiègeLaboratoire de Neuroanatomie et Neuroimagerie Translationnelles (LN2T), UNI-ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Chloé SamynLaboratoire de Neuroanatomie et Neuroimagerie Translationnelles (LN2T), UNI-ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Guillermo BorragánNeuropsychology and Functional Neuroimaging Research Unit (UR2NF), Centre for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences (CRCN), UNI-ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Philippe PeigneuxNeuropsychology and Functional Neuroimaging Research Unit (UR2NF), Centre for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences (CRCN), UNI-ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Mélanie StraussDepartments of Neurology, Psychiatry and Sleep Medicine, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), CUB Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
Hichem SlamaNeuropsychology and Functional Neuroimaging Research Unit (UR2NF), Centre for Research in Cognition and Neurosciences (CRCN), UNI-ULB Neuroscience Institute, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TloadDback task was introduced as a novel task for inducing cognitive fatigue by accounting for the cognitive capacity of each individual's processing time needs stimulus time duration (STD). The task is carried out on different days with calibration occurring on 1 day and fatigue induction occurring on another. The aim of this within subjects study is to assess the reliabilityThe of a single calibration. Fifty-one healthy participants (age = 32.2 +/- 13.45; sex

Indexed as

calibrationcognitive capacitycognitive fatiguecognitive fatigue inductionmethodologyreliabilityTloadDback taskvalidity

Identifiers

PMID40777221
PMCPMC12330871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.