Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40777213›Full record

ReviewJB & JS open access

Management of Glenoid Bone Loss in Primary Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Critical Analysis Review.

Erick Marigi, Kristin E Yu, Amanda Vasquez-Loret, Michael D Baird, Christopher M Hart, John W Sperling, Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erick MarigiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5560-7796
Kristin E YuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Amanda Vasquez-LoretDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2775-3838
Michael D BairdDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-9218
Christopher M HartDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Indiana University, Indiana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7280-708X
John W SperlingDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6569-7860
Joaquin Sanchez-SoteloDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3199-3247

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

» A thorough understanding of glenoid deformity is essential to anticipate intraoperative needs and manage bony deficiencies. Management strategies include eccentric reaming, alternate scapular line baseplate orientation, bone grafting, or metallic augmentation as either "off-the-shelf" or custom baseplates. Accurate implantation of the glenoid component in the presence of glenoid bone loss (GBL) may also benefit from shoulderspecific guides, navigation, or robotic assistance. » GBL can negatively affect outcomes due to compromised bony fixation, altered soft tissue tensioning, and component malposition, which can contribute to impingement, dislocation, aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear, and component failure. » In this article, we provide a comprehensive review of published literature regarding the management of GBL in primary RSA and provide additional insight on the effectiveness of current approaches to manage bony deficiency.

Identifiers

PMID40777213
PMCPMC12323907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.