ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2025
Misinformation or education? A comparative analysis of Instagram posts related to full mouth rehabilitation.
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Social media platforms have become pivotal in health communication, with Instagram serving as a key channel for sharing medical and dental information. Full Mouth Rehabilitation (FMR), a complex treatment aimed at restoring oral function and aesthetics, remains underrecognized by the general public. This study investigates the nature and accuracy of Instagram content related to FMR. Methods: A cross-sectional content analysis was conducted on 144 Instagram posts using FMR-related hashtags. Posts were classified based on content type, poster role (e.g., dental professional, clinic, influencer), engagement metrics (likes, comments), and accuracy of information. Statistical tests were applied to assess variations across content categories. Results: Marketing-oriented content constituted the majority of posts (75.7%), while educational content accounted for only 9%. Most posts (86.8%) contained non-factual or misleading information. In contrast, all educational posts were factually accurate. Engagement levels did not significantly differ between factual and non-factual posts. Dental professionals were responsible for only 5.6% of the total content, reflecting a notable lack of expert presence. Discussion: Instagram holds significant potential for disseminating accurate dental health information. However, the dominance of promotional content and the low involvement of dental professionals contribute to a high prevalence of misinformation. To enhance the platform's reliability as a health communication tool, increased participation by dental experts and improved content oversight are essential. Future research should evaluate strategies for promoting evidence-based information on social media, particularly for advanced procedures like FMR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.