ArticleFujita medical journal2025
Advanced machine learning models for prediction of readmission and mortality risks in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using routine clinical data.
Article in Fujita medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gastroesophageal reflux disease predicts 6-month readmission in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: development and validation of a nomogram.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Dynamic prediction of adverse outcomes in discharged COPD patients using patient-reported outcomes.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Observational
- Interpretable machine learning for predicting in-hospital mortality in COPD ICU patients: a rigorous validation across time and geography.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Nursing for Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases: A Scoping Review.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To develop a comprehensive machine learning model incorporating various clinical factors, including frailty and comorbidities, to predict 30-day readmission and mortality risk in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic health records (EHR) from Fujita Health University Hospital (2004-2019) for 1294 patients with COPD and 3499 hospitalization or death events. The EHR contained longitudinal patient data (demographics, diagnoses, test results, clinical records). We developed two eXtreme Gradient Boosting models, the comprehensive Top64 and practical 11-feature models. We compared these with the Comorbidity, Obstruction, Dyspnea, and Previous Exacerbations index (CODEX) model, a widely used tool for predicting hospital readmission or death in patients with COPD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 95% confidence interval (CI), sensitivity, and specificity were used to evaluate the model performance. Results: The Top64 (AUC: 0.769, 95% CI: 0.747-0.791) and practical 11-feature (AUC: 0.746, 95% CI: 0.730-0.762) models performed better than the CODEX model (AUC: 0.587, 95% CI: 0.563-0.611). The Top64 model showed 0.978 sensitivity and 0.341 specificity, and the practical 11-feature model achieved 0.955 sensitivity and 0.361 specificity. The calibration curves showed good agreement between the observed and predicted results for both models. Conclusions: A machine learning approach based on clinical data readily available from the EHR performed better than existing models in predicting 30-day readmission and mortality risks in patients with COPD. A comprehensive risk prediction tool may enhance individualized care strategies and improve patient outcomes in COPD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.