Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40777140›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America2025

Cast Removal.

Ryan Guilbault, Benjamin J Shore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan GuilbaultHarvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Benjamin J ShoreHarvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cast removal is a routine yet critical procedure in pediatric orthopaedic care, requiring meticulous attention to safety and detail to prevent avoidable complications such as thermal injury, lacerations, and subsequent patient anxiety. This review provides a comprehensive overview of best practices as it relates to safe cast removal, highlighting techniques, equipment considerations, and common pitfalls. Cast saws remain the standard tool for cast removal; however, improper use can result in friction burns or skin lacerations, particularly in young patients with thinner soft-tissue envelopes. Strategies to mitigate these risks include regular cast saw blade maintenance, proper saw angulation, intermittent cutting techniques, cooling of the blade, and the use of protective padding. Emerging technologies such as cast spreaders, alternative cutting tools, and water-softenable casting materials may further improve safety profiles. Additionally, patient cooperation and comfort plays a crucial role in safe cast removal, creating a calming environment and using child-friendly communication is paramount. In rare cases, sedation can be considered to help safely remove a cast in a traumatized child. This review synthesizes current evidence on the biomechanics of cast saws, injury risk factors, and training recommendations to enhance safety during cast removal. Key Concepts: (1)

Indexed as

Cast burnsCast paddingCast sawCast spreader

Identifiers

PMID40777140
PMCPMC12329124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.