ArticleJournal of medical signals and sensors2025
A Nonlinear Method to Identify Seizure Dynamic Trajectory Based on Variance of Recurrence Rate in Human Epilepsy Patients Using EEG.
Article in Journal of medical signals and sensors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- CMEpiNet: Complex-Valued Multimodal Epilepsy Detection Network Model.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgery is a well-established treatment for drug-resistant epilepsy, but outcomes are often suboptimal, especially when no lesion is visible on preoperative imaging. A major challenge in determining the seizure's origin and spread is interpreting electroencephalogram (EEG) data. Accurately tracing the seizure's signal trajectory, given the brain's complex behavior, remains a crucial hurdle. Materials and Methods: In this study, EEG data from 17 patients were analyzed, using the clinical interpretations of the epileptogenic region as the gold standard. Quantification analysis of recurrence plots primarily based on variance in recurrence rate was used to identify the regions involved during seizures based on investigation of the recurrence phenomena between the regions. This method allowed for a stage-wise analysis across EEG electrodes, highlighting simultaneously involved areas. Results: The method effectively distinguished involved from noninvolved regions across anterior, posterior, right temporal, and left temporal areas with macro averaged F-score of 95.54. For the anterior region, it achieved an overall accuracy (correct predictions out of total predictions) of 86.96%, sensitivity (ability to correctly identify seizure-involved regions) of 82.79%, and specificity (ability to correctly identify non-involved regions) of 86.96%. For the other regions, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity values ranged from 66.0% to 89.13%. Conclusions: This approach could pinpoint brain regions involved in seizures at any stage and could be useful for clinical monitoring and surgical planning. The method's simplicity and strong performance suggest it is promising for the real-time application during epilepsy treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.