ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Identification of SMYD2 as a candidate diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for gastric cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeting SMYD2 improves immunotherapy response in experimental hepatocellular carcinoma.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Histone modification enzymes (HMEs) are associated with cancer development, treatment response, and prognosis. However, the potential roles of HMEs in gastric cancer (GC) remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate their biological functions and mechanisms in GC, with additional focus on exploring the clinical value of SMYD2. Methods: We performed integrated analyses of transcriptome profiling and somatic mutation alteration in GC samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets to characterize HMEs alterations in GC. Consensus unsupervised clustering analysis was performed to identify HMEs-associated GC subtypes. Various machine learning methods were employed to construct an HMEs-based diagnostic model for GC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to evaluate model performance. SMYD2 expression in GC tissues was analyzed using TCGA and GEO data and validated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The association between SMYD2 and the tumor immune microenvironment in GC was evaluated using CIBERSORT, ESTIMATE, and TIDE algorithms. Functional characterization of SMYD2 was performed via SMYD2 knockdown in GC cells. Results: Most HMEs were up-regulated in GC tissues and exhibited relatively high mutation frequencies. GC patients were stratified into three HMEs-associated subtypes, with cluster 2 (C2) demonstrating significantly better prognosis than C1 and C3. The diagnostic model based on HMEs expression profiles showed robust performance for GC diagnosis. Notably, SMYD2 expression showed positive associations with CD8 Conclusions: These findings established SMYD2 is a major oncogene that can serve as a candidate diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.