Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40777131›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Identification of SMYD2 as a candidate diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for gastric cancer.

Sichao Wang, Chuanxi Zhao, Dongmei Li, Qingzhi Liu, Cuiping Mao, Shanshan Ding, Shujun Zhang, Wenjing Shang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sichao WangDepartment of Infectious Disease and Hepatology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Chuanxi ZhaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Dongmei LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Qingzhi LiuDepartment of Radiology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Cuiping MaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Shanshan DingDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Shujun ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Wenjing ShangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Histone modification enzymes (HMEs) are associated with cancer development, treatment response, and prognosis. However, the potential roles of HMEs in gastric cancer (GC) remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate their biological functions and mechanisms in GC, with additional focus on exploring the clinical value of SMYD2. Methods: We performed integrated analyses of transcriptome profiling and somatic mutation alteration in GC samples from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets to characterize HMEs alterations in GC. Consensus unsupervised clustering analysis was performed to identify HMEs-associated GC subtypes. Various machine learning methods were employed to construct an HMEs-based diagnostic model for GC. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to evaluate model performance. SMYD2 expression in GC tissues was analyzed using TCGA and GEO data and validated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The association between SMYD2 and the tumor immune microenvironment in GC was evaluated using CIBERSORT, ESTIMATE, and TIDE algorithms. Functional characterization of SMYD2 was performed via SMYD2 knockdown in GC cells. Results: Most HMEs were up-regulated in GC tissues and exhibited relatively high mutation frequencies. GC patients were stratified into three HMEs-associated subtypes, with cluster 2 (C2) demonstrating significantly better prognosis than C1 and C3. The diagnostic model based on HMEs expression profiles showed robust performance for GC diagnosis. Notably, SMYD2 expression showed positive associations with CD8 Conclusions: These findings established SMYD2 is a major oncogene that can serve as a candidate diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for GC.

Indexed as

diagnosisgastric cancerhistone modification enzymesprognosisSMYD2

Identifiers

PMID40777131
PMCPMC12328180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.