ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Dynamic circulating tumor DNA indicates pathological benefits of additional neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy courses for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05157776 (Neoadjuvant Sintilimab and Platinum-based Chemotherapy for Resectable Locally Advanced NSCLC Harboring no Driver Mutations), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neoadjuvant Sintilimab and Platinum-based Chemotherapy for Resectable Locally Advanced NSCLC Harboring no Driver Mutations: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Trial
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neoadjuvant or conversion anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy improves 2-year survival and achieves high pathological complete response rate in patients with stage IIB-IIIB small-cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Editorial: Liquid biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer for diagnosis, treatment selection and monitoring.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Circulating tumor DNA in lung cancer immunotherapy: prognostic marker today, predictive tool tomorrow?Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Few studies have focused on the optimal cycles of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCI). This study introduced minimal residual disease (MRD) based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and investigated the association between ctDNA-MRD and NCI cycles and pathological response. Materials and methods: This study was based on a phase III trial (NCT05157776). The patients with IIIA NSCLC without driver genes were given two cycles of NCI (initial two-cycle NCI), after which they were 1:1 randomly assigned to the two-cycle NCI groups (no additional NCI) or four-cycle NCI group (with another two cycles of NCI). Results: This study involved 13 patients with 28 blood samples. At the start of the study, ctDNA-MRD was detected in 10 out of the 13 patients (77%). The pathologically complete response (pCR) rate was higher in the four-cycle NCI group (3/6, 50%) than in the two-cycle NCI group (1/7, 14.2%). Remarkably, the subgroup that achieved ctDNA-MRD elimination after two cycles and kept elimination after additional two cycles had the highest pCR rate (3/4, 75.0%). Correspondently, the subgroup that did not achieve ctDNA-MRD elimination after two cycles and kept existence after additional two cycles had the lowest pCR rate (0/2, 0%). Generally, in the four-cycle group, a strong correlation between ctDNA-MRD and radiological assessment was observed (5/6, 83.3%). Conclusion: Patients with locally advanced NSCLC who achieved ctDNA-MRD elimination after two-cycle NCI were more likely to benefit from additional two-cycle NCI, manifesting higher pCR rates. ctDNA-MRD could be a promising tool to determine the optimal cycle of NCI. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrial.gov, NCT05157776.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.