Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40777102›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in urology2024

Urinary microbiome and urological cancers: a mini review.

Gianmarco Randazzo, Eleonora Bovolenta, Tommaso Ceccato, Giuseppe Reitano, Giovanni Betto, Giacomo Novara, Massimo Iafrate, Alessandro Morlacco, Fabrizio Dal Moro, Fabio Zattoni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gianmarco RandazzoDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Eleonora BovolentaDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Tommaso CeccatoDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Giuseppe ReitanoDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Giovanni BettoDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Giacomo NovaraDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Massimo IafrateDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Alessandro MorlaccoDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Fabrizio Dal MoroDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.
Fabio ZattoniDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The urinary microbiome (UMB) includes living bacteria, their genomes, and their products from interactions with the host environment. A "core" UMB could potentially exist, with variations between age and sex groups. Changes in UMB composition have been associated with benign urological disorders, but also with urologic cancers. Mechanisms through which UMB can trigger and maintain cancer can be local inflammation and interaction with immune system. Aim of the study: To describe the association between UMB and development of urologic cancers. Methods: A non-systematic literature review identified recently published studies (last 5 years), involving human patients, dealing with UMB. The database used for this review was PubMed, and the identified studies served as the base for a narrative analysis of the literature that explored the potential associations between UMB and urological cancers. Results: In bladder cancer (BC), UMB may play a role in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (and thus to progression to metastasis), as well as in effectiveness of BCG response rate. BC is also associated with changes in UMB, with bacterial richness indices increased in cancer groups compared to non-neoplastic groups and being different between NMIBC vs MIBC patients. In prostate cancer (PCa), there is an abundance in proinflammatory bacteria and uropathogens. In regard to renal cell carcinoma (RCC), penile cancer and testicular cancer there are still too few studies to draw significant conclusions about its relationship with the UMB. Conclusions: Gaining a deeper understanding of UMB role in urologic tumors could aid in the development of new therapies and improve classification of patients' risk.

Indexed as

BCG (Bacille Calmette-Guérin)bladder cancermicrobiome and dysbiosisprostate cancerrenal cell carcinomaurinary microbiomeUTUC (renal pelvis and ureter)

Identifiers

PMID40777102
PMCPMC12327262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.